THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAJUBHAI KANTIBHAI UKABHAI CHUNARA — 121/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001552026

e-Filing Number

11-11-2025

Filing Number

121/2026

Filing Date

20-Feb-2026

Registration No

121/2026

Registration Date

20-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

525

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJUBHAI KANTIBHAI UKABHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 121/2026 The court convicted Rajubhai Kantibhai Ukabhai Chunara under Section 65(A) of the Prohibition Act for possessing 16 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹3,200. However, considering the accused's impoverished background, family dependence, and voluntary guilty plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence of conviction with a fine of ₹200 (instead of the statutory minimum), and in default, five days simple imprisonment, rather than the more severe prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 121/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 121/2026 The court convicted Rajubhai Kantibhai Ukabhai Chunara under Section 65(A) of the Prohibition Act for possessing 16 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹3,200. However, considering the accused's impoverished background, family dependence, and voluntary guilty plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence of conviction with a fine of ₹200 (instead of the statutory minimum), and in default, five days simple imprisonment, rather than the more severe prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case