THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KANTABEN DILIPBHAI CHUNARA — 120/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110001542026
e-Filing Number
08-12-2025
Filing Number
120/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
120/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
581
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
KANTABEN DILIPBHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kantaben Dilipbhai Chunara (120/2026) Kantaben was charged under the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country liquor worth ₹1,000 found during a police check. She pleaded guilty and requested lenient sentencing, citing her poverty, family responsibilities, and that this was her first offense. The court convicted her under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act but imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment (till conviction) and ₹200 fine instead of the statutory maximum, considering her socioeconomic circumstances and genuine remorse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kantaben Dilipbhai Chunara (120/2026) Kantaben was charged under the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country liquor worth ₹1,000 found during a police check. She pleaded guilty and requested lenient sentencing, citing her poverty, family responsibilities, and that this was her first offense. The court convicted her under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act but imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment (till conviction) and ₹200 fine instead of the statutory maximum, considering her socioeconomic circumstances and genuine remorse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts