THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BRIJESHBHAI KAMLESHBHAI THAKKAR — 110/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001422026

e-Filing Number

16-01-2026

Filing Number

110/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

110/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

718

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BRIJESHBHAI KAMLESHBHAI THAKKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court convicted Brijeshbhai Kamleshbhai Thakkar under IPC Section 223 (omitting to make an entry in official records) and sentenced him to imprisonment up to 6 months or a fine of ₹2,000, with the alternative of 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the respondent's poor economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and commitment not to repeat the offense, applying sentencing principles from established judicial precedent to impose a lenient but appropriate punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 110/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Brijeshbhai Kamleshbhai Thakkar under IPC Section 223 (omitting to make an entry in official records) and sentenced him to imprisonment up to 6 months or a fine of ₹2,000, with the alternative of 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the respondent's poor economic circumstances, family responsibilities, and commitment not to repeat the offense, applying sentencing principles from established judicial precedent to impose a lenient but appropriate punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case