THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NANDUBEN SNJAYBHAI BABUBHAI TALAPDA — 108/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110001402026
e-Filing Number
08-12-2025
Filing Number
108/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
108/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
666
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
NANDUBEN SNJAYBHAI BABUBHAI TALAPDA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 108/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Nanduben Sanjaybhai Babubhai Talapda The court convicted the accused under Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 4 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹800 found during a police search on December 3, 2025. Considering mitigating factors—the accused's indigent background, first offense, family dependence, and voluntary guilty plea—the court imposed a lenient sentence of six months imprisonment and ₹200 fine instead of the maximum statutory punishment, emphasizing that justice is better served through proportionate rather than harsh sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 108/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Nanduben Sanjaybhai Babubhai Talapda The court convicted the accused under Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 4 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹800 found during a police search on December 3, 2025. Considering mitigating factors—the accused's indigent background, first offense, family dependence, and voluntary guilty plea—the court imposed a lenient sentence of six months imprisonment and ₹200 fine instead of the maximum statutory punishment, emphasizing that justice is better served through proportionate rather than harsh sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts