THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NANDUBEN SNJAYBHAI BABUBHAI TALAPDA — 108/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001402026

e-Filing Number

08-12-2025

Filing Number

108/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

108/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

666

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NANDUBEN SNJAYBHAI BABUBHAI TALAPDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 108/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Nanduben Sanjaybhai Babubhai Talapda The court convicted the accused under Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 4 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹800 found during a police search on December 3, 2025. Considering mitigating factors—the accused's indigent background, first offense, family dependence, and voluntary guilty plea—the court imposed a lenient sentence of six months imprisonment and ₹200 fine instead of the maximum statutory punishment, emphasizing that justice is better served through proportionate rather than harsh sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 108/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 108/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Nanduben Sanjaybhai Babubhai Talapda The court convicted the accused under Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 4 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹800 found during a police search on December 3, 2025. Considering mitigating factors—the accused's indigent background, first offense, family dependence, and voluntary guilty plea—the court imposed a lenient sentence of six months imprisonment and ₹200 fine instead of the maximum statutory punishment, emphasizing that justice is better served through proportionate rather than harsh sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case