THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PREMILABEN BABUBHAI CHUNARA — 107/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001392026

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

107/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

107/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

684

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PREMILABEN BABUBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case 107/2026 Summary The court convicted Premilaben Babubhai Chunara under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of illegal liquor (valued at ₹1,000). The court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment up to the date of conviction and a fine of ₹200, considering the accused's impoverished circumstances, family dependence, and first-time offense, while applying judicial discretion to impose lighter punishment than the statutory minimum to serve justice's broader interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 107/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 107/2026 Summary The court convicted Premilaben Babubhai Chunara under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of illegal liquor (valued at ₹1,000). The court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment up to the date of conviction and a fine of ₹200, considering the accused's impoverished circumstances, family dependence, and first-time offense, while applying judicial discretion to impose lighter punishment than the statutory minimum to serve justice's broader interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case