THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs NITABEN JAGDISHBHAI AMBALAL RAVAL — 106/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001382026

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

106/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

106/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

723

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NITABEN JAGDISHBHAI AMBALAL RAVAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    CASE SUMMARY: State of Gujarat v. Nitaben Jagdishbhai Ambalal Raval (106/2026) The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹600. Considering the accused's poor economic status, first-time offense, and family dependency, the court imposed a lenient sentence of conviction with a fine of ₹200 (instead of maximum penalty), and five days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 106/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: State of Gujarat v. Nitaben Jagdishbhai Ambalal Raval (106/2026) The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹600. Considering the accused's poor economic status, first-time offense, and family dependency, the court imposed a lenient sentence of conviction with a fine of ₹200 (instead of maximum penalty), and five days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case