THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs TEJALBEN KIRANBHAI THAKOR — 105/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001372026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

105/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

105/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

671

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

TEJALBEN KIRANBHAI THAKOR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Tejalben Kiranbhai Thakor (105/2026) The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for illegal possession of 4 liters of country liquor valued at ₹800. However, considering the respondent's poor economic status, family dependence, and lack of prior criminal record, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until court rising and a fine of ₹200 (instead of the statutory minimum), applying the doctrine of mitigated punishment recognized in established precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Tejalben Kiranbhai Thakor (105/2026) The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for illegal possession of 4 liters of country liquor valued at ₹800. However, considering the respondent's poor economic status, family dependence, and lack of prior criminal record, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until court rising and a fine of ₹200 (instead of the statutory minimum), applying the doctrine of mitigated punishment recognized in established precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case