THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SUBABEN JAYANTIBHAI CHUNARA — 103/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001352026

e-Filing Number

19-01-2026

Filing Number

103/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

103/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

710

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBABEN JAYANTIBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 103/2026 The State of Gujarat v. Subaben Jayantibhai Chunara The court convicted the respondent under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country liquor worth ₹1,000. However, recognizing that this was her first offense and considering her socioeconomic status as a poor, working-class woman supporting her family, the court imposed a lenient sentence rather than the maximum penalty, awarding a fine of ₹200 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the statutory maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 103/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 103/2026 The State of Gujarat v. Subaben Jayantibhai Chunara The court convicted the respondent under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country liquor worth ₹1,000. However, recognizing that this was her first offense and considering her socioeconomic status as a poor, working-class woman supporting her family, the court imposed a lenient sentence rather than the maximum penalty, awarding a fine of ₹200 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the statutory maximum punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case