THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MANGUBEN MANUBHAI CHUNARA — 102/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110001342026
e-Filing Number
24-11-2025
Filing Number
102/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
102/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
553
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
MANGUBEN MANUBHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Manguben Manubhai Chunara (102/2026) The court convicted the accused under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possession of 4 liters of country liquor valued at ₹800. The accused pleaded guilty and sought leniency, citing her status as a poor, working-class woman supporting her family. The court sentenced her to imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200, with additional simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, applying mitigating factors under established precedent to impose a lenient sentence rather than the maximum statutory punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Manguben Manubhai Chunara (102/2026) The court convicted the accused under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possession of 4 liters of country liquor valued at ₹800. The accused pleaded guilty and sought leniency, citing her status as a poor, working-class woman supporting her family. The court sentenced her to imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200, with additional simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, applying mitigating factors under established precedent to impose a lenient sentence rather than the maximum statutory punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts