THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SANJAYBHAI MAFATBHAI PUNJABHAI CHUNARA — 100/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001322026

e-Filing Number

29-11-2025

Filing Number

100/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

100/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

590

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAYBHAI MAFATBHAI PUNJABHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 100/2026 - The State of Gujarat v. Sanjaybhai Mafatbhai Punjabhai Chunara The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing and transporting 15 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹3,000. Recognizing the respondent as a poor, first-time offender from a lower-income background who supports his family through daily wages, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200, rather than applying the statutory minimum penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 100/2026 - The State of Gujarat v. Sanjaybhai Mafatbhai Punjabhai Chunara The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing and transporting 15 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹3,000. Recognizing the respondent as a poor, first-time offender from a lower-income background who supports his family through daily wages, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200, rather than applying the statutory minimum penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case