THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LAXMIBEN UDESINH JAWANBHAI GOHEL — 97/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001292026

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

97/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

97/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

716

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAXMIBEN UDESINH JAWANBHAI GOHEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    The court convicted Laxmiben Udesinh Jawanbhai Gohel under the Prohibition Act, Section 65, for possessing 3 liters of illegal liquor worth ₹600, and sentenced her to imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200. However, recognizing the respondent's impoverished background, dependent family status, and this being her first offense, the court reduced the sentence to simple imprisonment for 5 days and the same fine amount, considering lenient punishment would serve justice better. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 97/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Laxmiben Udesinh Jawanbhai Gohel under the Prohibition Act, Section 65, for possessing 3 liters of illegal liquor worth ₹600, and sentenced her to imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200. However, recognizing the respondent's impoverished background, dependent family status, and this being her first offense, the court reduced the sentence to simple imprisonment for 5 days and the same fine amount, considering lenient punishment would serve justice better. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case