THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KANTABEN BHIKHABHAI GOTABHAI GOHEL — 95/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110001272026
e-Filing Number
22-12-2025
Filing Number
95/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
95/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
667
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
KANTABEN BHIKHABHAI GOTABHAI GOHEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kantaben Bhikhabhai Gotabhai Gohel (95/2026) The court convicted Kantaben under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 3 liters of illegal liquor worth ₹600, seized during a police check on 03/12/2025. The defendant pleaded guilty, claiming to be from a poor, laboring family needing leniency. The court imposed a reduced sentence of conviction and a fine of ₹200 (instead of the maximum penalty), considering the defendant's first offense, poor economic circumstances, and genuine remorse. The seized liquor was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kantaben Bhikhabhai Gotabhai Gohel (95/2026) The court convicted Kantaben under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 3 liters of illegal liquor worth ₹600, seized during a police check on 03/12/2025. The defendant pleaded guilty, claiming to be from a poor, laboring family needing leniency. The court imposed a reduced sentence of conviction and a fine of ₹200 (instead of the maximum penalty), considering the defendant's first offense, poor economic circumstances, and genuine remorse. The seized liquor was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts