THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KAMLABEN RAVJIBHAI DAVDA — 93/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001252026

e-Filing Number

08-12-2025

Filing Number

93/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

93/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

655

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMLABEN RAVJIBHAI DAVDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary of Case 93/2026: THE STATE OF GUJARAT v. KAMLABEN RAVJIBHAI DAVDA The court convicted Kamlaben Ravjibhai Davda under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 2 liters of foreign liquor worth ₹400. Recognizing that this was her first offense and considering her impoverished circumstances as a laborer supporting her family, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine instead of the statutory minimum, exercising its discretion under sentencing law to serve justice while balancing compassion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 93/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 93/2026: THE STATE OF GUJARAT v. KAMLABEN RAVJIBHAI DAVDA The court convicted Kamlaben Ravjibhai Davda under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 2 liters of foreign liquor worth ₹400. Recognizing that this was her first offense and considering her impoverished circumstances as a laborer supporting her family, the court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine instead of the statutory minimum, exercising its discretion under sentencing law to serve justice while balancing compassion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case