THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DAKSHABEN WO LALABHAI BHURABHAI KAHAR — 89/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110001212026
e-Filing Number
16-01-2026
Filing Number
89/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
89/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
727
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
DAKSHABEN WO LALABHAI BHURABHAI KAHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Dakshaben The court convicted the accused Dakshaben under Section 65(e) of the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country-made liquor (valued at ₹1,000) that was seized during a police check. Instead of imposing the statutory minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient punishment of a fine of ₹200 considering the accused's impoverished background, family dependence, and voluntary guilty plea under Section 6 of the Probation Act. The judgment reduced the prescribed penalty based on special circumstances justifying lesser punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Dakshaben The court convicted the accused Dakshaben under Section 65(e) of the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country-made liquor (valued at ₹1,000) that was seized during a police check. Instead of imposing the statutory minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient punishment of a fine of ₹200 considering the accused's impoverished background, family dependence, and voluntary guilty plea under Section 6 of the Probation Act. The judgment reduced the prescribed penalty based on special circumstances justifying lesser punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts