THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DAKSHABEN WO LALABHAI BHURABHAI KAHAR — 89/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001212026

e-Filing Number

16-01-2026

Filing Number

89/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

89/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

727

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAKSHABEN WO LALABHAI BHURABHAI KAHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Dakshaben The court convicted the accused Dakshaben under Section 65(e) of the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country-made liquor (valued at ₹1,000) that was seized during a police check. Instead of imposing the statutory minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient punishment of a fine of ₹200 considering the accused's impoverished background, family dependence, and voluntary guilty plea under Section 6 of the Probation Act. The judgment reduced the prescribed penalty based on special circumstances justifying lesser punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Dakshaben The court convicted the accused Dakshaben under Section 65(e) of the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of country-made liquor (valued at ₹1,000) that was seized during a police check. Instead of imposing the statutory minimum sentence, the court imposed a lenient punishment of a fine of ₹200 considering the accused's impoverished background, family dependence, and voluntary guilty plea under Section 6 of the Probation Act. The judgment reduced the prescribed penalty based on special circumstances justifying lesser punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case