THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DINESHBHAI RANCHODBHAI CHUNARA — 88/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001202026

e-Filing Number

15-12-2025

Filing Number

88/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

88/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

631

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI RANCHODBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case 88/2026 Summary: The court convicted Dineshbhai Ranchodbhai Chunara under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 6 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹1200. Considering mitigating factors—that this was the accused's first offense and he belongs to a poor, laboring family supporting dependents—the court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200 (instead of the statutory minimum), rather than imposing harsher penalties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 88/2026 Summary: The court convicted Dineshbhai Ranchodbhai Chunara under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 6 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹1200. Considering mitigating factors—that this was the accused's first offense and he belongs to a poor, laboring family supporting dependents—the court imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200 (instead of the statutory minimum), rather than imposing harsher penalties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case