THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs CHAMPABEN VITHHALBHAI BHEMABHAI CHUNARA — 87/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110001192026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2026
Filing Number
87/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
87/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
721
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
CHAMPABEN VITHHALBHAI BHEMABHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 87/2026 The State of Gujarat prosecuted Champaben Vithhalbhai Bhemabhai Chunara under the Prohibition Act for possessing 2 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹400. The defendant pleaded guilty, citing poverty and family responsibilities as mitigating circumstances, seeking lenient sentencing. The court convicted her under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act but imposed a reduced sentence of ₹200 fine instead of the statutory maximum, considering her economic hardship, first-time offense status, and genuine remorse—applying judicial discretion to balance statutory penalties with equitable justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 87/2026 The State of Gujarat prosecuted Champaben Vithhalbhai Bhemabhai Chunara under the Prohibition Act for possessing 2 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹400. The defendant pleaded guilty, citing poverty and family responsibilities as mitigating circumstances, seeking lenient sentencing. The court convicted her under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act but imposed a reduced sentence of ₹200 fine instead of the statutory maximum, considering her economic hardship, first-time offense status, and genuine remorse—applying judicial discretion to balance statutory penalties with equitable justice principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts