THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DINESHBHAI BACHUBHAI CHUNARA — 84/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001162026

e-Filing Number

15-12-2025

Filing Number

84/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

84/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

642

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI BACHUBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Dineshbhai Bachubhai Chunara (84/2026) Dineshbhai Chunara was convicted under the Prohibition Act for possessing 4 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹800. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹200. However, considering mitigating factors—that this was his first offense, he comes from a poor family, and works as a laborer to support dependents—the court reduced the sentence to simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹200, with an additional 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 84/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Dineshbhai Bachubhai Chunara (84/2026) Dineshbhai Chunara was convicted under the Prohibition Act for possessing 4 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹800. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹200. However, considering mitigating factors—that this was his first offense, he comes from a poor family, and works as a laborer to support dependents—the court reduced the sentence to simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹200, with an additional 5 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case