THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HANSABEN CHANDUBHAI BACHUBHAI CHUNARA — 83/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001152026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-01-2026

Filing Number

83/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

83/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

697

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

HANSABEN CHANDUBHAI BACHUBHAI CHUNARA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary: Case 83/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Hansaben Chandubhai Bachubhai Chunara The court convicted Hansaben under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹600. However, considering her first offense, poor economic background, and family dependence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment up to the period already served plus a fine of ₹200, rather than the statutory maximum, finding special and adequate reasons to warrant leniency in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 83/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Hansaben Chandubhai Bachubhai Chunara The court convicted Hansaben under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹600. However, considering her first offense, poor economic background, and family dependence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment up to the period already served plus a fine of ₹200, rather than the statutory maximum, finding special and adequate reasons to warrant leniency in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case