THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs LAXMIBEN ARVINDBHAI CHUNARA — 82/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110001142026
e-Filing Number
06-01-2026
Filing Number
82/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
82/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
685
Police Station
KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
LAXMIBEN ARVINDBHAI CHUNARA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 82/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Laxmiben Arvindbhai Chunara The court convicted the respondent under Section 65(e) of the Prohibition Act for possessing 4 liters of illicit alcohol valued at ₹800. The respondent pleaded guilty and sought leniency, citing her status as a poor, working-class woman supporting her family. The court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until trial completion and a fine of ₹200, rather than the maximum prescribed penalty, exercising discretionary power to impose reduced punishment in light of her mitigating circumstances and socioeconomic condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 82/2026 - State of Gujarat v. Laxmiben Arvindbhai Chunara The court convicted the respondent under Section 65(e) of the Prohibition Act for possessing 4 liters of illicit alcohol valued at ₹800. The respondent pleaded guilty and sought leniency, citing her status as a poor, working-class woman supporting her family. The court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until trial completion and a fine of ₹200, rather than the maximum prescribed penalty, exercising discretionary power to impose reduced punishment in light of her mitigating circumstances and socioeconomic condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts