THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AJAYBHAI RAMESHBHAI CHUNARA — 76/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001082026

e-Filing Number

22-12-2025

Filing Number

76/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

76/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

693

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAYBHAI RAMESHBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Ajaybhai Rameshbhai Chunara (76/2026) The court convicted Ajaybhai Rameshbhai Chunara under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹600. However, considering the accused's plea of guilt, his impoverished economic status, and that this was his first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment for 10 days and a fine of ₹200 instead of the statutory maximum, relying on established precedent allowing reduced sentences where compelling mitigating circumstances exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Ajaybhai Rameshbhai Chunara (76/2026) The court convicted Ajaybhai Rameshbhai Chunara under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 3 liters of illicit liquor worth ₹600. However, considering the accused's plea of guilt, his impoverished economic status, and that this was his first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment for 10 days and a fine of ₹200 instead of the statutory maximum, relying on established precedent allowing reduced sentences where compelling mitigating circumstances exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case