THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KOKILABEN BHURABHAI CHANDUBHAI CHUNARA — 75/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001072026

e-Filing Number

15-12-2025

Filing Number

75/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

75/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

587

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KOKILABEN BHURABHAI CHANDUBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kokilaben Bhurabhai Chandubhai Chunara (75/2026) The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹1,000, which was seized during a police check. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine (instead of statutory punishment) considering the respondent's first-time offense, poor economic circumstances, and family responsibilities, while emphasizing that this lenient approach serves justice's broader interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kokilaben Bhurabhai Chandubhai Chunara (75/2026) The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act for possessing 5 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹1,000, which was seized during a police check. The court imposed a lenient sentence of ₹200 fine (instead of statutory punishment) considering the respondent's first-time offense, poor economic circumstances, and family responsibilities, while emphasizing that this lenient approach serves justice's broader interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case