THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs PRAKASHBHAI KALUBHAI CHUNARA — 74/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001062026

e-Filing Number

08-12-2025

Filing Number

74/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

74/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

564

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASHBHAI KALUBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Prakashbhai Kalubhai Chunara (74/2026) The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act for possessing 9 liters of illegal liquor and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of ₹200. However, recognizing the respondent's impoverished background, first-time offence, and family dependence, the court reduced the sentence to simple imprisonment and reduced the fine to ₹200, exercising its discretionary power under judicial principles of proportionate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 74/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Prakashbhai Kalubhai Chunara (74/2026) The court convicted the respondent under the Prohibition Act for possessing 9 liters of illegal liquor and sentenced him to imprisonment with a fine of ₹200. However, recognizing the respondent's impoverished background, first-time offence, and family dependence, the court reduced the sentence to simple imprisonment and reduced the fine to ₹200, exercising its discretionary power under judicial principles of proportionate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case