THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs AASHABEN BIJAYBHAI CHUNARA — 73/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001052026

e-Filing Number

24-11-2025

Filing Number

73/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

73/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

558

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AASHABEN BIJAYBHAI CHUNARA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Aashaben Bijaybhai Chunara (73/2026) The court convicted the respondent under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 14 liters of country-made liquor without permission. Considering the respondent's poor economic status, first-time offense, and family responsibilities as mitigating factors, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200, rather than the maximum statutory penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 73/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Aashaben Bijaybhai Chunara (73/2026) The court convicted the respondent under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 14 liters of country-made liquor without permission. Considering the respondent's poor economic status, first-time offense, and family responsibilities as mitigating factors, the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹200, rather than the maximum statutory penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case