THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RANJITBHAI MELABHAI THAKOR — 69/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001012026

e-Filing Number

15-12-2025

Filing Number

69/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

69/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

679

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJITBHAI MELABHAI THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case 69/2026: State of Gujarat v. Ranjitbhai Melabhai Thakor Summary: The court convicted Ranjitbhai Melabhai Thakor under the Prohibition Act for possessing 4 liters of illicit liquor. Considering mitigating circumstances—that the accused is from a poor, laboring class family supporting dependents—the court imposed a reduced sentence of simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹200, rather than the maximum prescribed penalty, emphasizing that lighter punishment serves the interests of justice when compelling reasons exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 69/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 69/2026: State of Gujarat v. Ranjitbhai Melabhai Thakor Summary: The court convicted Ranjitbhai Melabhai Thakor under the Prohibition Act for possessing 4 liters of illicit liquor. Considering mitigating circumstances—that the accused is from a poor, laboring class family supporting dependents—the court imposed a reduced sentence of simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹200, rather than the maximum prescribed penalty, emphasizing that lighter punishment serves the interests of justice when compelling reasons exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case