THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KASHIBEN KANUBHAI UDESINH THAKOR — 68/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110001002026

e-Filing Number

15-12-2025

Filing Number

68/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

68/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

670

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KASHIBEN KANUBHAI UDESINH THAKOR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court convicted Kashiben Kanubhai Udesinh Thakor under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 5 liters of illicit liquor worth Rs. 1,000. Considering the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, and this being a first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment up to conviction period plus a fine of Rs. 200 (instead of the statutory minimum), with additional simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Kashiben Kanubhai Udesinh Thakor under the Prohibition Act Section 65 for possessing 5 liters of illicit liquor worth Rs. 1,000. Considering the accused's poverty, family responsibilities, and this being a first offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment up to conviction period plus a fine of Rs. 200 (instead of the statutory minimum), with additional simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case