THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KIRITBHAI LILABHAI CHUNARA — 67/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110000992026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

16-01-2026

Filing Number

67/2026

Filing Date

17-02-2026

Registration No

67/2026

Registration Date

17-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

725

Police Station

KHEDA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Respondent(s)

KIRITBHAI LILABHAI CHUNARA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kiritbhai Lilabhai Chunara (67/2026) The court convicted the respondent under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 10 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹2,000. Considering the respondent's impoverished background, family dependence, and first-time offense, the court imposed lenient punishment: a fine of ₹250 (instead of the statutory minimum) and 5 days simple imprisonment (instead of the prescribed term), exercising judicial discretion to serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Kiritbhai Lilabhai Chunara (67/2026) The court convicted the respondent under Section 65 of the Prohibition Act for possessing 10 liters of illicit liquor valued at ₹2,000. Considering the respondent's impoverished background, family dependence, and first-time offense, the court imposed lenient punishment: a fine of ₹250 (instead of the statutory minimum) and 5 days simple imprisonment (instead of the prescribed term), exercising judicial discretion to serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case