ALERASUL SHAFIMIYA KAJI vs SHAKTIVIJAY BALVANTSANG RAVAL Advocate - V D PAREKH — 50/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 07th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110000762026
Filing Number
50/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
50/2026
Registration Date
05-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ALERASUL SHAFIMIYA KAJI
Adv. S N SHEKH
Respondent(s)
SHAKTIVIJAY BALVANTSANG RAVAL Advocate - V D PAREKH
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 16-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 12-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 24-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Cri.Case No.50/2026 The court found the accused guilty of dishonoring a check under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138. The accused had provided petitioner Alerasul Shafimiya Kaji with a check for ₹96,000 as security for a personal loan, but the check was dishonored due to insufficient funds in the account. The accused failed to repay the amount despite receiving proper notice and legal proceedings. Consequently, the court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment under Section 138 and ordered compensation of ₹96,000 payable to the petitioner within three months from the judgment date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Cri.Case No.50/2026 The court found the accused guilty of dishonoring a check under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138. The accused had provided petitioner Alerasul Shafimiya Kaji with a check for ₹96,000 as security for a personal loan, but the check was dishonored due to insufficient funds in the account. The accused failed to repay the amount despite receiving proper notice and legal proceedings. Consequently, the court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment under Section 138 and ordered compensation of ₹96,000 payable to the petitioner within three months from the judgment date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts