ALERASUL SHAFIMIYA KAJI vs SHAKTIVIJAY BALVANTSANG RAVAL Advocate - V D PAREKH — 50/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 07th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110000762026

Case disposed

Filing Number

50/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

50/2026

Registration Date

05-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

ALERASUL SHAFIMIYA KAJI

Adv. S N SHEKH

Respondent(s)

SHAKTIVIJAY BALVANTSANG RAVAL Advocate - V D PAREKH

Hearing History

Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

07-05-2026

Disposed

27-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

16-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

12-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

24-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary of Cri.Case No.50/2026 The court found the accused guilty of dishonoring a check under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138. The accused had provided petitioner Alerasul Shafimiya Kaji with a check for ₹96,000 as security for a personal loan, but the check was dishonored due to insufficient funds in the account. The accused failed to repay the amount despite receiving proper notice and legal proceedings. Consequently, the court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment under Section 138 and ordered compensation of ₹96,000 payable to the petitioner within three months from the judgment date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Cri.Case No.50/2026 The court found the accused guilty of dishonoring a check under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138. The accused had provided petitioner Alerasul Shafimiya Kaji with a check for ₹96,000 as security for a personal loan, but the check was dishonored due to insufficient funds in the account. The accused failed to repay the amount despite receiving proper notice and legal proceedings. Consequently, the court sentenced the accused to six months simple imprisonment under Section 138 and ordered compensation of ₹96,000 payable to the petitioner within three months from the judgment date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case