AMBALAL BHAIRAVSINH CHAUHAN vs FESALBHAI KARUKBHAI GHANCHI VAHORA Advocate - M U VAHORA — 28/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 07th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH110000652025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

28/2025

Filing Date

21-01-2025

Registration No

28/2025

Registration Date

21-01-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

AMBALAL BHAIRAVSINH CHAUHAN

Adv. B T BRAHMBHATT

Respondent(s)

FESALBHAI KARUKBHAI GHANCHI VAHORA Advocate - M U VAHORA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

26-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

15-01-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

06-01-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Kheda found the accused guilty of dishonoring a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant had lent Rs. 21,000 to the accused, who issued a cheque for repayment that was dishonored due to insufficient funds; the accused failed to respond to the statutory notice. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay Rs. 21,000 as compensation to the complainant, with an additional three months imprisonment if payment defaults. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Kheda found the accused guilty of dishonoring a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant had lent Rs. 21,000 to the accused, who issued a cheque for repayment that was dishonored due to insufficient funds; the accused failed to respond to the statutory notice. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay Rs. 21,000 as compensation to the complainant, with an additional three months imprisonment if payment defaults. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case