AMBALAL BHAIRAVSINH CHAUHAN vs FESALBHAI KARUKBHAI GHANCHI VAHORA Advocate - M U VAHORA — 28/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 07th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH110000652025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
28/2025
Filing Date
21-01-2025
Registration No
28/2025
Registration Date
21-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
AMBALAL BHAIRAVSINH CHAUHAN
Adv. B T BRAHMBHATT
Respondent(s)
FESALBHAI KARUKBHAI GHANCHI VAHORA Advocate - M U VAHORA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 26-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 15-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 06-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Kheda found the accused guilty of dishonoring a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant had lent Rs. 21,000 to the accused, who issued a cheque for repayment that was dishonored due to insufficient funds; the accused failed to respond to the statutory notice. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay Rs. 21,000 as compensation to the complainant, with an additional three months imprisonment if payment defaults. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Kheda found the accused guilty of dishonoring a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant had lent Rs. 21,000 to the accused, who issued a cheque for repayment that was dishonored due to insufficient funds; the accused failed to respond to the statutory notice. The court sentenced the accused to one year simple imprisonment and ordered him to pay Rs. 21,000 as compensation to the complainant, with an additional three months imprisonment if payment defaults. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts