Late Hirabhai Harkhabhai(Legal Heir) vs Late Moharbhai Harkhabhai Advocate - D B BHATT1. — 33/2014
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 034,038. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 20th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH110000552014
Next Hearing
20th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
33/2014
Filing Date
05-08-2014
Registration No
33/2014
Registration Date
05-08-2014
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDA
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Late Hirabhai Harkhabhai(Legal Heir)
Adv. M V SHAH1.
Khushalbhai hirabhai Makwana
Adv. M V SHAH
Respondent(s)
Late Moharbhai Harkhabhai Advocate - D B BHATT1.
Danabhai Morarbhai Makwana
Adv. D B BHATT1.
Hiraben Morarbhai Makwana
Adv. D B BHATT1.
Nareshbhai Morarbhai Makwana
Adv. D B BHATT1.
Vikrambhai Morarbhai Makwana
Adv. D B BHATT1.
bhanuprasad morarbhai Makwana
Adv. D B BHATT1.
Revaben Morarbhai Makwana
Adv. D B BHATT1.
Tejiben morarbhai Makwana
Adv. D B BHATT1.
Dahibebn Valjibhai Makwana
Adv. D B BHATT1.
Natubhai Premabhai Makwana
Adv. D B BHATT1.
Dahyabhai Premabhai Makwana
Adv. D B BHATT1.
Kankuben Premabhai Makwana
Adv. D B BHATT1.
Kantiben Premabhai MAkwana
Adv. D B BHATT
13 .DAHIBEN LALJIBHAI MAKWANA
Adv. D B BHATT
14.JIGISHABEN LALJIBHAI MAKWANA
Adv. D B BHATT
15. DHIMATKUMAR LALJIBHAI MAKWANA
Adv. D B BHATT
16.DINESHBHAI RANCHODBHAI PARMAR
Adv. D B BHATT
BHANUBEN RANCHODBHAI PARMAR
Adv. D B BHATT
18.SUSHILABEN RANCHODBHAI PARMAR
Adv. D B BHATT
19.KIRTANKUMAR RANCHODBHAI PARMAR
Adv. D B BHATT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 20-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 06-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 02-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 09-01-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The defendant's application under Order 7 Rule 11(a) and (d) to dismiss the suit on grounds of limitation and lack of cause of action has been rejected. The court found that the plaintiff, as a legal heir of Hirabhai, has a valid claim to his share in the disputed property and filed the suit within the 12-year limitation period prescribed under Article 110 of the Limitation Act. No costs have been awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendant's application under Order 7 Rule 11(a) and (d) to dismiss the suit on grounds of limitation and lack of cause of action has been rejected. The court found that the plaintiff, as a legal heir of Hirabhai, has a valid claim to his share in the disputed property and filed the suit within the 12-year limitation period prescribed under Article 110 of the Limitation Act. No costs have been awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts