ASHOKBHAI BACHUBHAI VAGHELA vs SAILESHBHAI MANEKBHAI TALPADA — 63/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH090012162022
Filing Number
63/2022
Filing Date
28-12-2022
Registration No
63/2022
Registration Date
28-12-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHOKBHAI BACHUBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. D B BHATT
Respondent(s)
SAILESHBHAI MANEKBHAI TALPADA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 27-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 16-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 09-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 63/2022 Court Decision: The Principal Civil Judge of Mahuva partially granted the plaintiff's claim for recovery of Rs. 75,000 (rupees seventy-five thousand) loaned to the defendant. The court found that the defendant borrowed this amount and issued cheques as repayment, but one cheque bounced due to insufficient funds. The defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 75,000 with 6% annual interest from July 22, 2017 (case filing date) until payment, along with court costs. Key Reasoning: The court accepted the plaintiff's documentary evidence (cheques and bank return memos) proving the loan transaction, while the defendant failed to appear or contest the claims. The court awarded simple interest at 6% per annum rather than the plaintiff's requested 12%, finding insufficient evidence of agreed interest terms, and decreed recovery from the defendant's person and property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 63/2022 Court Decision: The Principal Civil Judge of Mahuva partially granted the plaintiff's claim for recovery of Rs. 75,000 (rupees seventy-five thousand) loaned to the defendant. The court found that the defendant borrowed this amount and issued cheques as repayment, but one cheque bounced due to insufficient funds. The defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 75,000 with 6% annual interest from July 22, 2017 (case filing date) until payment, along with court costs. Key Reasoning: The court accepted the plaintiff's documentary evidence (cheques and bank return memos) proving the loan transaction, while the defendant failed to appear or contest the claims. The court awarded simple interest at 6% per annum rather than the plaintiff's requested 12%, finding insufficient evidence of agreed interest terms, and decreed recovery from the defendant's person and property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts