ASHOKBHAI BACHUBHAI VAGHELA vs SAILESHBHAI MANEKBHAI TALPADA — 63/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 23rd March 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKH090012162022

Case disposed

Filing Number

63/2022

Filing Date

28-12-2022

Registration No

63/2022

Registration Date

28-12-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 9

Petitioner(s)

ASHOKBHAI BACHUBHAI VAGHELA

Adv. D B BHATT

Respondent(s)

SAILESHBHAI MANEKBHAI TALPADA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

23-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

27-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

16-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 63/2022 Court Decision: The Principal Civil Judge of Mahuva partially granted the plaintiff's claim for recovery of Rs. 75,000 (rupees seventy-five thousand) loaned to the defendant. The court found that the defendant borrowed this amount and issued cheques as repayment, but one cheque bounced due to insufficient funds. The defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 75,000 with 6% annual interest from July 22, 2017 (case filing date) until payment, along with court costs. Key Reasoning: The court accepted the plaintiff's documentary evidence (cheques and bank return memos) proving the loan transaction, while the defendant failed to appear or contest the claims. The court awarded simple interest at 6% per annum rather than the plaintiff's requested 12%, finding insufficient evidence of agreed interest terms, and decreed recovery from the defendant's person and property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 63/2022 Court Decision: The Principal Civil Judge of Mahuva partially granted the plaintiff's claim for recovery of Rs. 75,000 (rupees seventy-five thousand) loaned to the defendant. The court found that the defendant borrowed this amount and issued cheques as repayment, but one cheque bounced due to insufficient funds. The defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 75,000 with 6% annual interest from July 22, 2017 (case filing date) until payment, along with court costs. Key Reasoning: The court accepted the plaintiff's documentary evidence (cheques and bank return memos) proving the loan transaction, while the defendant failed to appear or contest the claims. The court awarded simple interest at 6% per annum rather than the plaintiff's requested 12%, finding insufficient evidence of agreed interest terms, and decreed recovery from the defendant's person and property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case