Government of Gujarat vs BHALABHAI @ BHALIYO FULABHAI JEHABHAI TALPADA Advocate - H C DHARIYA — 571/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,457,380,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH090008812024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
571/2024
Filing Date
10-10-2024
Registration No
571/2024
Registration Date
10-10-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204039240270
Police Station
MAHUDHA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHALABHAI @ BHALIYO FULABHAI JEHABHAI TALPADA Advocate - H C DHARIYA
MANUBHAI CHHAGANBHAI @ VAGHAJIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. N J PANDYA
VIKRAMBHAI @ KALABHAI VAGHAJIBHAI MAHERAMBHAI BHARWAD
Adv. N J PANDYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 08-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 03-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 01-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class court in Mujhada acquitted all three accused (Bhalabhai, Manubhai, and Vikrambhai) of theft charges under IPC Sections 454, 457, 380, and 114 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that while the complainant testified about the theft of 110 bundles of tobacco worth approximately ₹1,20,000 from his godown, the prosecution failed to establish direct or circumstantial proof linking the accused to the crime, particularly noting inconsistencies in the panch (witness) testimony and lack of credible recovery evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class court in Mujhada acquitted all three accused (Bhalabhai, Manubhai, and Vikrambhai) of theft charges under IPC Sections 454, 457, 380, and 114 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that while the complainant testified about the theft of 110 bundles of tobacco worth approximately ₹1,20,000 from his godown, the prosecution failed to establish direct or circumstantial proof linking the accused to the crime, particularly noting inconsistencies in the panch (witness) testimony and lack of credible recovery evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts