Government of Gujarat vs BHALABHAI @ BHALIYO FULABHAI JEHABHAI TALPADA Advocate - H C DHARIYA — 570/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,457,380,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH090008792024
Filing Number
570/2024
Filing Date
09-Oct-2024
Registration No
570/2024
Registration Date
09-Oct-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204039240269
Police Station
MAHUDHA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHALABHAI @ BHALIYO FULABHAI JEHABHAI TALPADA Advocate - H C DHARIYA
-
2.MANUBHAI CHHAGANBHAI @ VAGHAJIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. N J PANDYA
-
3.VIKRAMBHAI @ KALABHAI VAGHAJIBHAI MAHERAMBHAI BHARWAD
Adv. N J PANDYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class court in Mujdana, Kheda, acquitted all three accused (Bhalabhai, Manubhai, and Vikrambhai) of charges under IPC sections 454, 457, 380, and 114 related to alleged tobacco theft from the complainant's godown. The court found that while tobacco was stolen, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crime, as the complainant was not an eyewitness, the panch witnesses provided no corroborating evidence, and the recovery of tobacco from the accused was not conclusively linked to the godown theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-May-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Nov-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 570/2024
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class court in Mujdana, Kheda, acquitted all three accused (Bhalabhai, Manubhai, and Vikrambhai) of charges under IPC sections 454, 457, 380, and 114 related to alleged tobacco theft from the complainant's godown. The court found that while tobacco was stolen, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the crime, as the complainant was not an eyewitness, the panch witnesses provided no corroborating evidence, and the recovery of tobacco from the accused was not conclusively linked to the godown theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts