Government of Gujarat vs DIPTIBEN PRABHODCHANDRA GANDHI Advocate - P.K.KAPATEL — 466/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,420,409,114. Status: FRAMING OF CHARGE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH090005832019
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
466/2019
Filing Date
15-05-2019
Registration No
466/2019
Registration Date
15-05-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DIPTIBEN PRABHODCHANDRA GANDHI Advocate - P.K.KAPATEL
TRIBHOVANBHAI DAHYABHAI PARMAR
Adv. N.J.PANDYA
JASUBHAI FULABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. N.B.CHAUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
FRAMING OF CHARGE
FRAMING OF CHARGE
FRAMING OF CHARGE
FRAMING OF CHARGE
FRAMING OF CHARGE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE | |
| 11-02-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE | |
| 03-02-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE | |
| 21-01-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE | |
| 06-01-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 466/2019, Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Mahudha, Kheda Outcome: The application filed by Accused No. 1 (Diptiben Prabodhchandra Gandhi), a Gram Talati, seeking to drop proceedings on grounds of Section 197 CrPC protection for public servants, was rejected. The court held that while Section 197 requires prior sanction before prosecuting a public servant for acts done in official duty, the question of whether the accused acted dishonestly or with personal gain can only be determined after recording evidence; therefore, the case shall proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 466/2019, Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Mahudha, Kheda Outcome: The application filed by Accused No. 1 (Diptiben Prabodhchandra Gandhi), a Gram Talati, seeking to drop proceedings on grounds of Section 197 CrPC protection for public servants, was rejected. The court held that while Section 197 requires prior sanction before prosecuting a public servant for acts done in official duty, the question of whether the accused acted dishonestly or with personal gain can only be determined after recording evidence; therefore, the case shall proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts