UNION BANK OF INDIA vs MATHURBHAI MANGALBHAI PARMAR — 6/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37. Disposed: Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT on 08th May 2026.
SMST R - SUMMARY SUIT - REGULAR
CNR: GJKH090003892024
Filing Number
6/2024
Filing Date
10-May-2024
Registration No
6/2024
Registration Date
10-May-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--EX-PARTE JUDGEMENT
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UNION BANK OF INDIA
Adv. S A TEREDESAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MATHURBHAI MANGALBHAI PARMAR
-
2.RAMESHCHANDRA MANGALBHAI PARMAR
-
3.BALABHAI AMRATBHAI PARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Order
Case Summary: SMST/R/06/2024 Union Bank of India v. Mathurbhai Mangalbhai Parmar & Others The court partially allowed Union Bank of India's summary suit for recovery of ₹14,54,454 against agricultural loan defaulters. Since the defendants failed to appear within 10 days of summons as required under Order 37 CPC, their default constituted deemed admission of the bank's claims. The court awarded the full principal amount plus 6% per annum interest (reduced from the contractual 10.65%) from suit filing to decree date, considering the agricultural nature of the loan, along with suit costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-May-2026
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Apr-2026
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Apr-2026
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Jan-2026
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Dec-2025
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Nov-2025
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Oct-2025
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Sep-2025
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jul-2025
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jul-2025
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jul-2025
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-May-2025
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Apr-2025
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2025
Hearing On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2025
Documentary Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jan-2025
Documentary Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2024
Summons Of Suit
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Oct-2024
Summons Of Suit
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Sep-2024
Summons Of Suit
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Sep-2024
Summons Of Suit
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Aug-2024
Summons Of Suit
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Aug-2024
Summons Of Suit
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jul-2024
Summons Of Suit
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jun-2024
Summons Of Suit
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2024
Case Summary: SMST/R/06/2024 Union Bank of India v. Mathurbhai Mangalbhai Parmar & Others The court partially allowed Union Bank of India's summary suit for recovery of ₹14,54,454 against agricultural loan defaulters. Since the defendants failed to appear within 10 days of summons as required under Order 37 CPC, their default constituted deemed admission of the bank's claims. The court awarded the full principal amount plus 6% per annum interest (reduced from the contractual 10.65%) from suit filing to decree date, considering the agricultural nature of the loan, along with suit costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts