RANCHHODBHAI KALIDAS @ KALABHAI KATARIYA vs RAMANBHAI GANGABHAI KATARIYA — 27/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH090003682020
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
27/2020
Filing Date
28-09-2020
Registration No
27/2020
Registration Date
28-09-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RANCHHODBHAI KALIDAS @ KALABHAI KATARIYA
Adv. S.T.PATELIYA
BALUBHAI KALABHAI ROHIT
Respondent(s)
RAMANBHAI GANGABHAI KATARIYA
HEIRS OF LATE NARANBHAI KALABHAI KATARIYA(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 06-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 16-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 23-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 02-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 27/2020 Court: Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Mahudha, Kheda District Outcome: Plaintiffs' application for interim injunction REJECTED (17 November 2025) The court dismissed the plaintiffs' request to restrain defendants from interfering with ancestral property (City Survey No. 1094, Alina village). The judge found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Key issue: the 1942 sale deed was unregistered and violated Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, invalidating the plaintiffs' claimed inheritance rights. The defendants possessed actual possession and revenue record entries, while plaintiffs provided no documentary proof of ownership or possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 27/2020 Court: Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Mahudha, Kheda District Outcome: Plaintiffs' application for interim injunction REJECTED (17 November 2025) The court dismissed the plaintiffs' request to restrain defendants from interfering with ancestral property (City Survey No. 1094, Alina village). The judge found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, balance of convenience, or irreparable loss. Key issue: the 1942 sale deed was unregistered and violated Section 54 of the Transfer of Property Act, invalidating the plaintiffs' claimed inheritance rights. The defendants possessed actual possession and revenue record entries, while plaintiffs provided no documentary proof of ownership or possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts