MAHESHABHAI SAMANTBHAI BHOJANI vs IMTYAZ S. MALEK — 235/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH090002862025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
235/2025
Filing Date
21-03-2025
Registration No
235/2025
Registration Date
21-03-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHESHABHAI SAMANTBHAI BHOJANI
Adv. R B BHATT
Respondent(s)
IMTYAZ S. MALEK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 27-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque of ₹2,00,000. The accused issued the cheque as repayment for borrowed funds but failed to honor it when presented. The court found the accused guilty of the offense, rejecting his defense that no consideration existed for the cheque, as statutory presumptions favor the complainant once the cheque is produced as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque of ₹2,00,000. The accused issued the cheque as repayment for borrowed funds but failed to honor it when presented. The court found the accused guilty of the offense, rejecting his defense that no consideration existed for the cheque, as statutory presumptions favor the complainant once the cheque is produced as evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts