VAHORA ISHAK MAHAMMAD GULAMRASUL vs HABIBBHAI IBRAHIMBHAI SHAIKH — 14/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39,9,151. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKH090002192024

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

14/2024

Filing Date

06-03-2024

Registration No

14/2024

Registration Date

06-03-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 39,9,151

Petitioner(s)

VAHORA ISHAK MAHAMMAD GULAMRASUL

Adv. G K MAKWANA

Respondent(s)

HABIBBHAI IBRAHIMBHAI SHAIKH

MAHAMMADHANIF IBRAHIMBHAI SHAIKH

HALIMBIBI IBRAHIMKHATUN

HANIFABIBI IRAHIM KHATUN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

04-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

12-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

03-02-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

21-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

09-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

17-02-2025
ORDER

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 14/2024 Outcome: The court allowed the petitioner's application for a declaratory decree. The Principal Civil Judge ruled that petitioner Vahora Ishak Mahammad Gulamrasul has established direct possession and ownership rights over the disputed agricultural land in Mahudha through 45+ years of continuous cultivation, harvesting, and enjoyment of produce, thereby acquiring ownership through adverse possession under law. The respondents are permanently restrained from interfering with the petitioner's possession and from transferring, encumbering, or creating any charges on the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 14/2024 Outcome: The court allowed the petitioner's application for a declaratory decree. The Principal Civil Judge ruled that petitioner Vahora Ishak Mahammad Gulamrasul has established direct possession and ownership rights over the disputed agricultural land in Mahudha through 45+ years of continuous cultivation, harvesting, and enjoyment of produce, thereby acquiring ownership through adverse possession under law. The respondents are permanently restrained from interfering with the petitioner's possession and from transferring, encumbering, or creating any charges on the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case