Government of Gujarat vs VIPULBHAI @ LALO RAMABHAI PATEL Advocate - A B KALYANI — 20/2023
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 4,5. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH090000552023
Filing Number
20/2023
Filing Date
06-Jan-2023
Registration No
20/2023
Registration Date
06-Jan-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VIPULBHAI @ LALO RAMABHAI PATEL Advocate - A B KALYANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted all 13 accused individuals of gambling charges under the Gambling Act, finding insufficient evidence and procedural defects in the prosecution's case. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish a sound legal foundation for conviction, noting absence of independent witness testimonies, reliance solely on police statements, and gaps in documentary evidence regarding ownership of the venue. The court held that without credible corroborating evidence, the charges could not be sustained and ordered the release of seized property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Oct-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Sep-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-May-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jan-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Oct-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Aug-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jul-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-May-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Mar-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 20/2023
Summary The court acquitted all 13 accused individuals of gambling charges under the Gambling Act, finding insufficient evidence and procedural defects in the prosecution's case. The court determined that the prosecution failed to establish a sound legal foundation for conviction, noting absence of independent witness testimonies, reliance solely on police statements, and gaps in documentary evidence regarding ownership of the venue. The court held that without credible corroborating evidence, the charges could not be sustained and ordered the release of seized property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts