JASHODABEN PRABHATBHAI TALPADA vs MURTUZAMIYA MUSTUFAMIYA MALEK Advocate - H A PATEL — 9/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 009. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH090000042012
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
9/2012
Filing Date
27-03-2012
Registration No
9/2012
Registration Date
27-03-2012
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUDHA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JASHODABEN PRABHATBHAI TALPADA
Adv. R C SAKSENA
PUNJIBEN MOHANBHAI TALPADA(Legal Heir)
Adv. R C SAKSENA2.
BABUBHAI MOHANBHAI TALPDA 2.
JIVABHAI MOHANBHAI TALPADA 2.
RADHABEN MOHANBHAI TALPADA 2.
LEELABEN MOHANBHAI TALPDA 2.
KAMLABEN MOHANBHAI TALPDA 2.
LALITABEN MOHANBHAI TALPDA
GANGABEN NARANBHAI TALPADA
Adv. R C SAKSENA
SUBHADRABEN CHIMANBHAI TALPADA
Adv. R C SAKSENA
Respondent(s)
MURTUZAMIYA MUSTUFAMIYA MALEK Advocate - H A PATEL
BACHUMIYA MUSTUFAMIYA MALEK
Adv. K C PATEL
AMAN ULLA MUSTUFAMIYA MALEK
Adv. H A PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 23-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 16-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 31-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 22-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS/09/2012 Court: Taluka Court at Mahudha, Gujarat Outcome: Plaintiff's suit dismissed on 07/10/2016. The plaintiffs (daughters of deceased Dhanabhai) challenged a 1990 registered Will allegedly made under fraud/undue influence, seeking to declare it null and void. The defendants (legal heirs of Madinaben) claimed the testator freely bequeathed the property to them out of love and affection. The court found the plaintiffs failed to prove forgery or fraud through cogent evidence. The registered Will bore proper Sub-Registrar attestation and signatures; the testator died 5 years later without attempting revocation; and the suit was filed 22 years after registration without explaining the delay. No suspicious circumstances were established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS/09/2012 Court: Taluka Court at Mahudha, Gujarat Outcome: Plaintiff's suit dismissed on 07/10/2016. The plaintiffs (daughters of deceased Dhanabhai) challenged a 1990 registered Will allegedly made under fraud/undue influence, seeking to declare it null and void. The defendants (legal heirs of Madinaben) claimed the testator freely bequeathed the property to them out of love and affection. The court found the plaintiffs failed to prove forgery or fraud through cogent evidence. The registered Will bore proper Sub-Registrar attestation and signatures; the testator died 5 years later without attempting revocation; and the suit was filed 22 years after registration without explaining the delay. No suspicious circumstances were established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts