Government of Gujarat vs NELSANBHAI JONBHAI GOHIL Advocate - D R SODHAPARMAR — 471/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH080008232024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
471/2024
Filing Date
05-08-2024
Registration No
471/2024
Registration Date
05-08-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHLAL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NELSANBHAI JONBHAI GOHIL Advocate - D R SODHAPARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 27-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 25-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 471/2024, Katlal Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Nelsonbhai Jonbhai Gohil, of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), and 114 (criminal intimidation, causing hurt, and criminal intimidation with common intention), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The complainant's testimony lacked corroboration; his own cross-examination contradicted the original complaint, and medical/documentary evidence failed to substantiate the serious allegations of assault and death threats. The incident appeared to be a mere verbal altercation rather than the grievous offense alleged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 471/2024, Katlal Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Nelsonbhai Jonbhai Gohil, of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), and 114 (criminal intimidation, causing hurt, and criminal intimidation with common intention), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The complainant's testimony lacked corroboration; his own cross-examination contradicted the original complaint, and medical/documentary evidence failed to substantiate the serious allegations of assault and death threats. The incident appeared to be a mere verbal altercation rather than the grievous offense alleged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts