Government of Gujarat vs NELSANBHAI JONBHAI GOHIL Advocate - D R SODHAPARMAR — 471/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH080008232024

Filing Number

471/2024

Filing Date

05-Aug-2024

Registration No

471/2024

Registration Date

05-Aug-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, KATHLAL

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506(2),114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NELSANBHAI JONBHAI GOHIL Advocate - D R SODHAPARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 471/2024, Katlal Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Nelsonbhai Jonbhai Gohil, of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), and 114 (criminal intimidation, causing hurt, and criminal intimidation with common intention), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The complainant's testimony lacked corroboration; his own cross-examination contradicted the original complaint, and medical/documentary evidence failed to substantiate the serious allegations of assault and death threats. The incident appeared to be a mere verbal altercation rather than the grievous offense alleged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 03-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 06-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 28-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 26-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 17-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 08-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 05-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 471/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: Criminal Case No. 471/2024, Katlal Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gujarat Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Nelsonbhai Jonbhai Gohil, of charges under IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2), and 114 (criminal intimidation, causing hurt, and criminal intimidation with common intention), finding the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The complainant's testimony lacked corroboration; his own cross-examination contradicted the original complaint, and medical/documentary evidence failed to substantiate the serious allegations of assault and death threats. The incident appeared to be a mere verbal altercation rather than the grievous offense alleged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case