SUNDARSINH BABAJI ZALA vs TAKHATSINH ABHESINH CHAUHAN — 4/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: Notice To Opponents. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU
CNR: GJKH080005542021
Filing Number
4/2021
Filing Date
17-Jun-2021
Registration No
4/2021
Registration Date
14-Jun-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHLAL
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNDARSINH BABAJI ZALA
Adv. J.S.SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
-
1.TAKHATSINH ABHESINH CHAUHAN
-
2.HOTHABHAI ABHESINH CHAUHAN
-
3.MINOR SONALBEN BABUBHAI PARMAR PARENTS-BABUBHAI PARMAR
-
4.MINOR YOGESHBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR PARENTS- BABUBHAI PARMAR
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
18-May-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Feb-2026
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Dec-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Nov-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Sep-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Sep-2025
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Sep-2025
Restored
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Aug-2024
OrderView PDF
Summary of Case 4/2021 - Sundarsinh Babaji Zala v. Takhatsinh Abhesinh Chauhan Outcome: The petitioner's application for condonation of delay and restoration of a dismissed civil suit (Case No. 10/2015) was dismissed. The court rejected the plea to condone a delay of 2 years, 11 months, and 0 days in refiling the case after it was dismissed for default on 18-07-2018. The court found the petitioner displayed gross negligence and apathy toward his own case and held that such an inordinate delay cannot be justified in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Aug-2024
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jul-2024
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-May-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-May-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Apr-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jan-2024
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Oct-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Sep-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Aug-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Jun-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Apr-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jan-2023
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Nov-2022
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2022
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Aug-2022
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jun-2022
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Mar-2022
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jan-2022
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Nov-2021
Notice To Opponents
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Aug-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jun-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2021
Summary of Case 4/2021 - Sundarsinh Babaji Zala v. Takhatsinh Abhesinh Chauhan Outcome: The petitioner's application for condonation of delay and restoration of a dismissed civil suit (Case No. 10/2015) was dismissed. The court rejected the plea to condone a delay of 2 years, 11 months, and 0 days in refiling the case after it was dismissed for default on 18-07-2018. The court found the petitioner displayed gross negligence and apathy toward his own case and held that such an inordinate delay cannot be justified in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts