SUNDARSINH BABAJI ZALA vs TAKHATSINH ABHESINH CHAUHAN — 4/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Status: NOTICE TO OPPONENTS. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU
CNR: GJKH080005542021
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
4/2021
Filing Date
17-06-2021
Registration No
4/2021
Registration Date
14-06-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHLAL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNDARSINH BABAJI ZALA
Adv. J.S.SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
TAKHATSINH ABHESINH CHAUHAN
HOTHABHAI ABHESINH CHAUHAN
MINOR SONALBEN BABUBHAI PARMAR PARENTS-BABUBHAI PARMAR
MINOR YOGESHBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR PARENTS- BABUBHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
NOTICE TO OPPONENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
| 02-02-2026 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
| 23-12-2025 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
| 18-11-2025 | NOTICE TO OPPONENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 4/2021 - Sundarsinh Babaji Zala v. Takhatsinh Abhesinh Chauhan Outcome: The petitioner's application for condonation of delay and restoration of a dismissed civil suit (Case No. 10/2015) was dismissed. The court rejected the plea to condone a delay of 2 years, 11 months, and 0 days in refiling the case after it was dismissed for default on 18-07-2018. The court found the petitioner displayed gross negligence and apathy toward his own case and held that such an inordinate delay cannot be justified in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 4/2021 - Sundarsinh Babaji Zala v. Takhatsinh Abhesinh Chauhan Outcome: The petitioner's application for condonation of delay and restoration of a dismissed civil suit (Case No. 10/2015) was dismissed. The court rejected the plea to condone a delay of 2 years, 11 months, and 0 days in refiling the case after it was dismissed for default on 18-07-2018. The court found the petitioner displayed gross negligence and apathy toward his own case and held that such an inordinate delay cannot be justified in the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts