KANTIBHAI NATHABHAI BRAHMBHATT vs SAFIMIYAN USMANMIYAN MALEK — 17/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 001. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH080005172017
Filing Number
17/2017
Filing Date
15-03-2017
Registration No
17/2017
Registration Date
15-03-2017
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHLAL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KANTIBHAI NATHABHAI BRAHMBHATT
Adv. S P SODHAPARMAR
Respondent(s)
SAFIMIYAN USMANMIYAN MALEK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 28-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 20-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 17/2017 Court: Principal Civil Court, Kathlal Petitioner: Kantibhai Nathabhai Brahmbhatt Respondent: Safimiyan Usmanmiyan Malek Claim Amount: ₹2,25,000 Decision The court partially allowed the petitioner's suit. The respondent is ordered to repay the petitioner's loan of ₹2,25,000 (two lakh twenty-five thousand rupees) along with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until payment, from both personal and all other property. The petitioner successfully proved through a promissory note and postal acknowledgment that the respondent received this amount as a loan but failed to repay it despite a legal notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 17/2017 Court: Principal Civil Court, Kathlal Petitioner: Kantibhai Nathabhai Brahmbhatt Respondent: Safimiyan Usmanmiyan Malek Claim Amount: ₹2,25,000 Decision The court partially allowed the petitioner's suit. The respondent is ordered to repay the petitioner's loan of ₹2,25,000 (two lakh twenty-five thousand rupees) along with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until payment, from both personal and all other property. The petitioner successfully proved through a promissory note and postal acknowledgment that the respondent received this amount as a loan but failed to repay it despite a legal notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts