PRATAPBHAI RUPAJI SOLANKI vs MANIBHAI SAVABHAI BARAIYA Advocate - S.N.PATHAN — 41/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 31. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH080003642020
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
Filing Number
41/2020
Filing Date
18-09-2020
Registration No
41/2020
Registration Date
18-09-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHLAL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRATAPBHAI RUPAJI SOLANKI
Adv. K.R.DABHI
Respondent(s)
MANIBHAI SAVABHAI BARAIYA Advocate - S.N.PATHAN
SHRIMIALI GIRISHKUMAR DALSUKHBHAI
Adv. S N PATHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 12-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 23-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 07-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 41/2020 Court: Principal Civil Judge, Kathlal Parties: Pratapbhai Rupaji Solanki (Petitioner) v. Manibhai Savabhai Baraiya & Others (Respondents) Order: The court granted the petitioner's interim (temporary) order petition. The court ordered that all respondents are prohibited from creating any disturbance, interference, or obstruction to the petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural land, and from selling, mortgaging, or transferring the property in any manner until final judgment. The court maintained the status quo of the land until the case's final disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 41/2020 Court: Principal Civil Judge, Kathlal Parties: Pratapbhai Rupaji Solanki (Petitioner) v. Manibhai Savabhai Baraiya & Others (Respondents) Order: The court granted the petitioner's interim (temporary) order petition. The court ordered that all respondents are prohibited from creating any disturbance, interference, or obstruction to the petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed agricultural land, and from selling, mortgaging, or transferring the property in any manner until final judgment. The court maintained the status quo of the land until the case's final disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts