DINESHBHAI ABHESINH SOLANKI vs MANIBHAI SAVABHAI BARAIYA — 40/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 31. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH080003632020
Filing Number
40/2020
Filing Date
18-Sep-2020
Registration No
40/2020
Registration Date
18-Sep-2020
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHLAL
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DINESHBHAI ABHESINH SOLANKI
Adv. K.R.DABHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANIBHAI SAVABHAI BARAIYA
-
2.SHRIMIALI GIRISHKUMAR DALSHUKHBHAI
Adv. S N PATHAN
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
14-May-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Feb-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2025
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2024
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Sep-2024
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 40/2020 DINESHBHAI ABHESINH SOLANKI v. MANIBHAI SAVABHAI BARAIYA & SHRIMIALI GIRISHKUMAR DALSHUKHBHAI The court granted interim relief (temporary injunction) in favor of the petitioner. The petitioner sought protection of agricultural land (three field parcels) from interference by respondents pending final judgment. The court found that the petitioner's ancestors held valid registered sale documents (1978) establishing ownership, while respondents acquired the same property through subsequent registrations in 2020. The court ordered all respondents to maintain status quo—preventing them from selling, encumbering, or interfering with the petitioner's possession of the disputed agricultural land until final case disposal. The court also noted concerns about potential multiple sales and determined the petitioner had a stronger claim based on original documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Sep-2024
Issues
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Sep-2024
Order On Injuction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Aug-2024
Order On Injuction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Aug-2024
Order On Injuction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jul-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jun-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-May-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Apr-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Apr-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jan-2024
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Dec-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Nov-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Oct-2023
Written Statement/Reply
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Sep-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Aug-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jul-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jul-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jun-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-May-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Apr-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Feb-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jan-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Dec-2022
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Nov-2022
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Aug-2022
Written Statement/Reply
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-May-2022
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2022
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2021
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Nov-2021
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Aug-2021
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jun-2021
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Mar-2021
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Dec-2020
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Nov-2020
Summons - Notice
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Oct-2020
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Sep-2020
Case filed
Registration No. 40/2020
Case Summary: 40/2020 DINESHBHAI ABHESINH SOLANKI v. MANIBHAI SAVABHAI BARAIYA & SHRIMIALI GIRISHKUMAR DALSHUKHBHAI The court granted interim relief (temporary injunction) in favor of the petitioner. The petitioner sought protection of agricultural land (three field parcels) from interference by respondents pending final judgment. The court found that the petitioner's ancestors held valid registered sale documents (1978) establishing ownership, while respondents acquired the same property through subsequent registrations in 2020. The court ordered all respondents to maintain status quo—preventing them from selling, encumbering, or interfering with the petitioner's possession of the disputed agricultural land until final case disposal. The court also noted concerns about potential multiple sales and determined the petitioner had a stronger claim based on original documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts