Government of Gujarat vs BHARATSINH LALABHAI PARMAR Advocate - R R PARMAR — 54/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 304A,279,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH080001142025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
54/2025
Filing Date
29-01-2025
Registration No
54/2025
Registration Date
29-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHLAL
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHARATSINH LALABHAI PARMAR Advocate - R R PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 02-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused, Bhratsingh Lalbhai Parmar, of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(a) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, giving him the benefit of doubt due to insufficient evidence. The complainant failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the vehicle driver responsible for the fatal accident that killed his son, as the complainant could not identify the driver or establish the accused's involvement in the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused, Bhratsingh Lalbhai Parmar, of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(a) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, giving him the benefit of doubt due to insufficient evidence. The complainant failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the vehicle driver responsible for the fatal accident that killed his son, as the complainant could not identify the driver or establish the accused's involvement in the incident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts