Government of Gujarat vs HITESHKUMAR DIPSINH GOHIL Advocate - G H UPADHYAY — 38/2025

JudegementView PDF

Case Summary: C.C.No:-38/2025 The court acquitted defendant Hiteshkumar Dipsinh Gohil of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338, and MV Act sections 177, 184, finding insufficient evidence that he was responsible for a motor vehicle accident on July 4, 2021. Although the complainant suffered a shoulder fracture and injuries in the collision, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's negligent driving caused the accident, as no witness could positively identify the vehicle or driver involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Judgement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 38/2025