Government of Gujarat vs PRAVINKUMAR @ SHAILESH BABUBHAI PARMAR Advocate - R R PARMAR — 25/2025

JudegementView PDF

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Kathlal acquitted both accused persons under the Prohibition Act on grounds that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the prohibited liquor was in their possession. The court found significant gaps in the evidence, particularly noting that the panchnama (recovery memo) lacked corroboration from independent witnesses and the FSL report confirming the seized items were prohibited alcohol was not produced. Consequently, both accused were acquitted and discharged under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plea

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plea

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plea

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plea

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Plea

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 25/2025