NARAYANLAL GOVARDHAN BAGAVAT vs NARAYANLAL LAHARULAL GADARI Advocate - S C PANCHAL — 19/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 27th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH080000602025

Filing Number

19/2025

Filing Date

08-Jan-2025

Registration No

19/2025

Registration Date

08-Jan-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KATHLAL

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

27-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NARAYANLAL GOVARDHAN BAGAVAT

    Adv. D L ZALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARAYANLAL LAHARULAL GADARI Advocate - S C PANCHAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case 19/2025 - Summary Court Decision: The accused, Narayanlal Laharlal Gadari, was convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 (dishonored cheque). The court found that he issued a cheque of ₹64,000 to the complainant against a legitimate debt but failed to honor it despite receiving legal notice. Sentence: The accused is sentenced to 1 year imprisonment and fined ₹5,000 (additional 1-month imprisonment if fine unpaid). Additionally, he must pay ₹64,000 compensation to the complainant within 60 days (3 additional months imprisonment if compensation not paid). A non-bailable arrest warrant has been issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 02-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 29-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 31-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 18-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 30-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 29-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 02-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 29-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 01-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 13-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 08-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 19/2025 - Summary Court Decision: The accused, Narayanlal Laharlal Gadari, was convicted under the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 (dishonored cheque). The court found that he issued a cheque of ₹64,000 to the complainant against a legitimate debt but failed to honor it despite receiving legal notice. Sentence: The accused is sentenced to 1 year imprisonment and fined ₹5,000 (additional 1-month imprisonment if fine unpaid). Additionally, he must pay ₹64,000 compensation to the complainant within 60 days (3 additional months imprisonment if compensation not paid). A non-bailable arrest warrant has been issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case