OJEFA MUJJAFAR HUSAIN VHORA MANAGER THASRA VEPARI MANDAL CO.OP. CREDIT SOCIETY vs AJITBHAI RAMANBHAI RATHOD Advocate - M S SHEKH — 4/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
SMST R - SUMMARY SUIT - REGULAR
CNR: GJKH070009352025
Filing Number
4/2025
Filing Date
22-Dec-2025
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
22-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, THASRA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Last updated 16-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.OJEFA MUJJAFAR HUSAIN VHORA MANAGER THASRA VEPARI MANDAL CO.OP. CREDIT SOCIETY
Adv. C C PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJITBHAI RAMANBHAI RATHOD Advocate - M S SHEKH
Case History
-
06-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary Suit No. 04/2025 - Court Order Summary Outcome: Plaintiff's summary suit allowed in part; defendant's live to defend plea conditionally permitted. Plaintiff granted decree for Rs. 6,69,198/- with 10% interest deposit requirement from defendant within 30 days to continue defense. Key Points: The court rejected the defendant's unconditional leave to defend plea, finding insufficient genuine triable issues. However, conditional leave to defend was granted under applicable case law principles regarding summary suits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Mar-2026
Order On Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Feb-2026
Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Jan-2026
Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jan-2026
Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2026
Leave To Defend
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2025
Summary Suit No. 04/2025 - Court Order Summary Outcome: Plaintiff's summary suit allowed in part; defendant's live to defend plea conditionally permitted. Plaintiff granted decree for Rs. 6,69,198/- with 10% interest deposit requirement from defendant within 30 days to continue defense. Key Points: The court rejected the defendant's unconditional leave to defend plea, finding insufficient genuine triable issues. However, conditional leave to defend was granted under applicable case law principles regarding summary suits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts