Government of Gujarat vs SEJALBEN W/O VIKRAMBHAI ARJUNBHAI PARMAR Advocate - N K VAGHELA — 538/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506,(2)114,135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH070007562024
Filing Number
538/2024
Filing Date
27-06-2024
Registration No
538/2024
Registration Date
27-06-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, THASRA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204060240110
Police Station
THASRA POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SEJALBEN W/O VIKRAMBHAI ARJUNBHAI PARMAR Advocate - N K VAGHELA
VIKRAMBHAI ARJUNBHAI PARMAR
Adv. N K VAGHELA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 17-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 13-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sejalben W/O Vikrambhai Arjunbhai Parmar (Case 538/2024) The court convicted Sejalben of assault causing grievous bodily harm (IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2) and GP Act Section 135), sentencing her to one month simple imprisonment and ₹500 fine, or ten days additional imprisonment if fine unpaid. The court rejected her mitigation plea citing her poverty and two children, finding the assault's severity warranted proportionate punishment to deter such serious crimes and send proper social message. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Sejalben W/O Vikrambhai Arjunbhai Parmar (Case 538/2024) The court convicted Sejalben of assault causing grievous bodily harm (IPC Sections 323, 504, 506(2) and GP Act Section 135), sentencing her to one month simple imprisonment and ₹500 fine, or ten days additional imprisonment if fine unpaid. The court rejected her mitigation plea citing her poverty and two children, finding the assault's severity warranted proportionate punishment to deter such serious crimes and send proper social message. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts